Monopolized Madness: A Critique of Mad Studies Through a Consumerist Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.39783Abstract
This perspective piece surveys the peer-reviewed Mad Studies literature from 2013 to 2023 from the lived experience of someone who identifies as a consumer of mental health services. I postulate that researchers who self-identify as ‘consumer’ while engaging with Mad Studies may feel excluded because of its theorizing being steeped in anti-psychiatry and survivor scholarship, the depreciation of consumers’ voice, and the vast under-representation of self-identifying consumers in the peer-reviewed scholarship.
Keywords: Mad Studies, c/s/x, psychiatric survivor, consumers, anti-psychiatry
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Greg Procknow

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright over their work and license their work for publication in Critical Disabilities Discourses under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivaties 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0). This means that the work is available for commercial and non-commercial use and reproduction provided that the original authors are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited, following standard academic practice.