Epistemic Oases and the Disability Rights Movement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25071/1918-6215.39788Abstract
Historically, people with disabilities have been denied the agency to create their own narratives about their lived experiences. This silencing has led to cultural misunderstandings of disability that have contributed to institutionalism and other physical and epistemic harms, casting disability to the lower rungs of society. The powerful impacts of the disability rights movement, including deinstitutionalization, were made possible by grassroots groups of disabled activists who worked in community with each other and formed what we describe as epistemic oases. An epistemic oasis is a localized group of individuals with a shared marginalized identity through which hermeneutical resources are developed that lead to collective resistance. We draw on Fricker’s (2007) and Pohlhaus’ (2020) work on epistemic injustice and identify examples of epistemic oases that led to prominent events throughout the disability rights movement, resulting in positive political change. We examine the communities developed at Camp Janed, the University of California, Berkeley, and Gallaudet University and contend that these are examples of epistemic oases that fostered collective resistance in the twentieth century.
Keywords: Epistemic injustice, disability rights movement, disability studies, epistemic oasis, critical disability studies
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ethan W Jackson, Rebekah Wallis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright over their work and license their work for publication in Critical Disabilities Discourses under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivaties 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0). This means that the work is available for commercial and non-commercial use and reproduction provided that the original authors are credited and the original publication in this journal is cited, following standard academic practice.